Dcn Joseph thinks over the debate, Craig critiques his performance and Bishop Enoch answers all of the questions. At least that's how it looks on paper.
Dcn Joseph thinks over the debate, Craig critiques his performance and Bishop Enoch answers all of the questions. At least that’s how it looks on paper.
For those who want access to what I was citing: https://orthodoxchristiantheology.com/2019/10/22/review-of-albrecht-and-suaidens-immaculate-conception-debate/
Hello Fathers. If your next program involves critiquing anti-Orthodox myths, then I would like to ask you to discuss in some detail the “dark truth about Josephat Kuntsevych that Rome doesn’t want you to know” since you’ve implied several times on the show that he’s been whitewashed. Thank you.
– AtomicLead
42:12
We don't think think think this whole new ideas developed over time.
That's what he's trying to prove!
So if Gregory Palamas creates the essence-energies distiction, it's "The faith once and for all delivered to the saints", but if you try to do the same thing, that is inference, with the Immaculate Conception, it's "developed over time". How is that different?